Home Daily Brief Dear Haroon Sidiqui: What Do You Think of Palestine House Now?

Dear Haroon Sidiqui: What Do You Think of Palestine House Now?

by Mike Fegelman

On December 1, Toronto Star columnist Haroon Siddiqui sharply criticized the Harper government for cutting funding to Palestine House last year. The Harper government had indicated it would cease funding of the Palestinian non-profit due to concerns of its “pattern of support for extremism”. The government stated Palestine House aligned itself with terrorist causes, including celebrating the release of terrorists and those responsible for numerous armed attacks and hijackings in the 1960’s and 1970’s. In response, Palestine House stated it denounced all forms of terrorism and extremism.

In his column, Sidiqui stated “The prime minister portrays himself as a staunch ally of Israel, and tends to brand those who don’t agree with him as anti-Semitic and bully them — as discovered by the Christian ecumenical group Kairos, the Canadian Arab Federation and Palestine House, whose funding was cut, and Montreal-based Rights and Democracy, which was destroyed. In fact, what Harper has done is to take sides with the right wing in an ideological and political struggle within Israel and the Jewish diaspora. He could have sided with those who do not agree with Israeli expansionism and permanent war on the Palestinians”.

Now that Palestine House has once again betrayed Canadian values by celebrating convicted terrorists as heroes in a recent solidarity rally for terrorist-cum-hunger-strikers involved in attacks and kidnapping attempts against Israelis, does Siddiqui still believe the Harper government erred in withdrawing funding from a group aligned with terrorists?

Comments

comments

You may also like

1 comment

David Moll March 16, 2013 - 12:55 am

Toronto Star columnist Haroon Siddiqui doesn’t understand that ‘words are sacred. Words are the only containers/vessels Siddiqui has with which to convey TRUTH. When Siddiqui then used words to mislead or deceive the reader, he lost his ability to communicate with his public,BUT more seriously, he lost his credibility as a communicator. A journalist/reporter just ONCE reports his own bias as the entire story, is going to be ignored as shallow and glib, and someone who can be ignored as credible.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Help Fight Media Bias Against Israel!

Sign up for email alerts from HonestReporting Canada to receive vital resources that educate and empower you.
SUBSCRIBE
close-link